<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Comparison of genomic and MALDI-TOF MS based proteomic clustering in Enterococcus faecalis

dc.contributor.authorOtkun, Songul
dc.contributor.authorCevik, Yasemin Numanoglu
dc.contributor.authorTel, Osman Yasar
dc.date.accessioned2026-10-23T18:14:01Z
dc.date.available2026-10-23T18:14:01Z
dc.date.issued2026
dc.departmentSiirt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThe MALDI-TOF MS identification method is based on the comparison of protein profiles of microorganisms with reference profiles. This technique also enables the determination of phylogenetic relationships, such as similarity and divergence, among different species belonging to the same genus. In this study, the concordance between MALDI-TOF MS-based phyloproteomic analysis and ddl gene-based phylogenetic analysis was evaluated in Enterococcus faecalis strains (n = 13). Genomic and proteomic clustering patterns were comparatively assessed. DNA was extracted from E. faecalis strains obtained from the laboratory strain collection, and the ddl gene was amplified by PCR and subsequently sequenced. In addition, phyloproteomic analyses were performed using MATLAB software based on the data obtained from MALDI-TOF MS analyses. A phylogenetic tree was constructed using the UPGMA method based on the Tamura 3-parameter (T92) model. Clustering patterns of the strains were compared using genomic- and proteomic-based dendrograms. Some strains showing genomic similarity were found to be located in different subclusters in proteomic analyses. The findings demonstrated that protein expression profiles play an important role in strain identification; however, they may not directly reflect the genetic similarity relationships among strains. These results suggest that although genomic- and proteomicbased analyses provide compatible results for strain identification, they may reveal different clustering patterns when evaluating relationships among strains. This study contributes to the comparative evaluation of genomicand proteomic-based analyses and provides insight into the scope and limitations of these methods.
dc.description.sponsorshipSiirt University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) [2025-SIbull;VET-04] -- This study was supported by Siirt University Scientific Research Projects Coordination Unit (BAP) under Project No: 2025-SIcenter dotUVET-04.
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117552
dc.identifier.issn0732-8893
dc.identifier.issn1879-0070
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid42468182
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105044746409
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2026.117552
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/12252
dc.identifier.volume116
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001827127100001
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier Science Inc
dc.relation.ispartofDiagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_WOS_20261017
dc.subjectMaldi-Tof Ms
dc.subjectPhylogenetic
dc.subjectPhyloproteomic
dc.subjectE. Faecalis
dc.titleComparison of genomic and MALDI-TOF MS based proteomic clustering in Enterococcus faecalis
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar