<link rel="stylesheet" href="styles.f3b1fba60ec7970c.css">

Evaluation of the efficacy of different semen extenders for chilled storage of Aseel rooster sperm

dc.authorid0000-0002-9568-2088
dc.authorid0000-0002-9355-498X
dc.authorid0000-0002-9767-7469
dc.contributor.authorArici, R.
dc.contributor.authorGunay, E.
dc.contributor.authorSenlikci, H.
dc.contributor.authorYagcioglu, S.
dc.contributor.authorEser, A.
dc.contributor.authorSandal, A. i.
dc.contributor.authorAlkan, S.
dc.date.accessioned2026-03-14T11:49:05Z
dc.date.available2026-03-14T11:49:05Z
dc.date.issued2025
dc.departmentSiirt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractSemen extenders are pivotal in maintaining the integrity and quality of avian sperm throughout the storage period. In this study, we evaluated the effectiveness of three commonly used extenders, Lake (LAKE), Beltsville Poultry Semen Extender (BPSE), and EK extender, in the storage of Aseel rooster semen at 5 degrees C for 48 hours. The control group was provided with Lactated Ringer's solution. Spermatological analyses were conducted at 0, 24, and 48 hours to evaluate the time-dependent effects of these extenders on sperm motility, viability, morphological changes, mitochondrial function, membrane functionality, and both acrosome and plasma membrane integrity in sperm cells. The results indicated that the BPSE and EK extenders exhibited higher total and progressive motility rates compared to the control and LAKE extenders at 24 and 48 hours. Additionally, morphological damage rates were lower in the EK and BPSE extenders than in the LAKE extender at these time points. Mitochondrial activity was higher in the EK extender than in the LAKE extender at 24 hours. Acrosome integrity and plasma membrane integrity rates declined over time; however, they remained similar among all groups at corresponding time points. In conclusion, BPSE and EK extenders, characterized by higher fructose content and greater osmolality, were found to be more effective in preserving the sperm quality of Aseel rooster semen during cold storage compared to the LAKE extender.
dc.description.sponsorshipIstanbul University-Cerrahpascedil;a Research Fund [TSA-2021-35772]
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was funded by the Istanbul University-Cerrahpa & scedil;a Research Fund (TSA-2021-35772) .
dc.identifier.doi10.24425/pjvs.2025.154957
dc.identifier.endpage387
dc.identifier.issn1505-1773
dc.identifier.issn2300-2557
dc.identifier.issue3
dc.identifier.pmid40996118
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-105016908307
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage379
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.24425/pjvs.2025.154957
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/9080
dc.identifier.volume28
dc.identifier.wosWOS:001589004300003
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ3
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherPolska Akad Nauk, Polish Acad Sciences, Univ Warmia & Mazury Olsztyn
dc.relation.ispartofPolish Journal of Veterinary Sciences
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_WoS_20260310
dc.subjectPoultry Sperm
dc.subjectSemen Extenders
dc.subjectSemen Storage
dc.titleEvaluation of the efficacy of different semen extenders for chilled storage of Aseel rooster sperm
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar